| Just Other Articles |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Business > Why You Should Never Give A Key To Your Office To An Employee |
|
Just Other Articles - Why You Should Never Give A Key To Your Office To An Employee
Stay in business long enough and you’ll most likely develop friendships with some of your employees. Maybe not a close friendship but one that gives you and them a comfort zone that differs from when According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product they were first hired. As more trust is built or gained through ongoing working relations, usually everyone lowers their guard a bit and begins to settle into a “working relationship”. It’s not an un ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in common practice or unusual expectation to offer a key to your Office Manager or a key personal assistant (no pun intended). In fact, I’ve found it to be quite normal that ranking personnel have access lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. to certain files and other business trade secrets that are not available to each and every colleague. That doesn’t mean they know every asset of the company and have access to all things. However an here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe implied trust is given and whatever they learn, is to spur on the company’s business and enable them to do the best job for you as their employer. If you as an employer do not have certain “fail safe” d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro tactics in place you are setting yourself up for a hard lesson. I’m suggesting its not “if” but only a matter of time before someone takes an undue advantage of their position. I would agree most ar ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc e minor and don’t require firing, let alone a lawsuit. However, you would be wise to install certain procedures that allow you to check up on your employees. It’s a good practice to call into your of easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi fice and pose as a potential customer (or existing customer) and ask questions about your products and/or services. Monitor calls if you have a phone system that allows you to do such a thing and grad nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically your employee’s performances and critique their customer service calls. You will learn a great deal as to how your “real” customers are being handled and glean good information in the area of employe and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ e conduct. I’m writing from experience. I had given extra liberties to one of my employees, including supplying a key to the office. He had asked me if he could work nights due to he wanted to finis ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi h up some college classes at our local university. This particular individual was able to begin and complete our jobs without much supervision. He had computer skills that others didn’t have at the t ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a ime, that enabled him to excel in areas were we needed more help. I agreed to his new schedule and allowed him to come in at the end of the business day and work till late evening. BIG MISTAKE! Shor dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod ly thereafter I noticed his production began to drop off. For some strange reason his progress diminished and jobs began to become incomplete. When I approached him his response was, “I had homework” cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin . (Call it a clue when your employee offers up ‘homework’ as an excuse for not finishing their job). I strongly suggest he communicate with me if these matters were to continue keeping him from compl tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen eting the tasks. He agreed but things didn’t change. I returned to work one Monday morning in January to find none of the scheduled work was completed. Not one job had even been started! I decided t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel that was it, enough was enough and it was time to let him go and move on. When he arrived later that afternoon I expressed my disappointment and fired him! Upon retrieving the office key, he flipped ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust t to me as if to say … “so what”! A few days later one of my other employees informed me he was competing with me and calling our customers. Calling them and offering to do their contract work at one y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products -third of the normal price! This was a moment of utter aggravation!! I later learned he had helped himself to ALL of our proprietary software (software that had been developed over nearly a decade) a . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de long with copying our entire customer database! This my friends is a whole other story and would require many pages of writing to inform you of all that happened over a total of 11 years!! That’s rig elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip ht, eleven years of litigation. A long story short … My Company secured over a $650,000.00 judgment, that grew into more than 1 MILLION over the years! We sued and we won!! It was an expensive key!! tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Nina Winters Awarded Commission for Quarter Million Dollar Sculpture Medical Billing - Troubleshooting Retail Sales
|